To be a true global leader, executives must learn to
welcome differences with curiosity and empathy in a way that seeks mutual
benefit and growth.
Imagine
the following scenario. In a training room of executive learners from a
multinational petrochemical corporation, there are at least 20 different
nationalities present. Like most such gatherings, learners initially sat with
their own: Brits, Malays, Chinese, Nigerians, Indians, Saudis, French and
Russians all sitting as remote from each other as their nations appear on a
globe.
“Go
find the person most different from yourself and start a conversation.”
Everyone
froze. Not surprisingly, no one is initially comfortable enough to do it.
Perhaps because people are conditioned by society to believe that difference is
at least cause for hesitation. Being different is often assumed to mean “less
than.”
After
some prodding, the room began to look more heterogeneous.
In
the end, this kind of exercise can illustrate a valuable lesson: To be global
as an individual and as an organization requires that executives embrace
diverse learning at the personal/interpersonal level and at the business level.
This includes learning to embrace differences with personal curiosity and
empathy.
This
is the fundamental step in making an organization global, but most companies
aren’t willing. A 2013 Right Management study reported that 42 percent of
individuals in overseas assignments fail. The same study found 22 percent
of North American companies don’t provide learning preparation for executives
being sent abroad.
Don’t
Miss Global Opportunities
Expatriate, international businessperson and global executive: These three terms are often used interchangeably, but each have distinct roles and the latter is all encompassing.
Expatriate, international businessperson and global executive: These three terms are often used interchangeably, but each have distinct roles and the latter is all encompassing.
Most
global executives are expatriates, which means they generally stay in one place
abroad but aren’t necessarily tasked with leadership roles. International executives
have leadership roles and are aware of global differences but don’t necessarily
need to engage with local personnel.
Truly
global executives, however, must lead in these situations and be comfortable
moving fluidly through different time zones, cultures and geopolitical
boundaries. In other words, the distinctive characteristic for global leaders
is their ease of engagement and re-engagement — the ability toengage in
meaningful, effective and productive ways in any locale.
Marriott
Elevates Its Global General Managers
When
it comes to Marriott International Inc.’s general management training,
employees have checked in for an extended stay.
“We
don’t want it to be a fire hose experience where in a week you’ll get 15
topics,” said Tim Tobin, vice president of global learning and leadership
development.
The
hotel chain’s Elevate program gives employees a year of training in owner
relations, sales and revenue management, brand, customer focus, intercultural
communications, human resources, finance and crisis communication — all pivotal
parts of being general managers.
These
skills are delivered through a variety of methods, including classroom, individual
development planning, mentorships and webinars. Toward the end of the program,
participants complete a two-week shadow period and participate in peer forums
made up of their fellow trainees.
“All
of leadership development has got to have a component that’s not just
developing skills, but also creating deep roots in terms of what are your
values, what is your purpose in life and what assumptions do you make about
your role as a leader and the impact you have on the lives around you,” said
Kathleen Ross, executive vice president of leadership development at consulting
firm Healthy Companies International. “Otherwise it’s hollow and unauthentic.”
In
the next several years, Marriott wants to expand its presence in Asia by 30
percent and in the Middle East by 50 percent. To get there, it has to add at
least 300 general managers. Tobin said Elevate has prepared 400 potential
general managers worldwide to fill those spots.
Elevate
pulls employees focused on particular functional areas and exposes them to the
rest of the job before they’re promoted. This approach shrank
speed-to-performance rates from 10 to 12 months to two to four weeks.
Elevate
creates cohorts of 30 to 40 people from more than 55 countries and
territories. This deepens the talent pool from which international properties
can find general managers with the right skills and cultural background.
General
managers are Marriott’s front-line leaders who work with customers,
communities, financials and other employees, Tobin said. In a global setting
like Marriott’s, understanding cultural context is pivotal to communicate with
all levels of internal and external partners.
But
knowing how to successfully work with these groups takes more than having the
right answers.
“Sometimes
you get more seduced into having the answers rather than connecting with
people,” Ross said. “We’re not looking for answers, but for human connection
and assurance. That’s whether you’re a front-line supervisor or a CEO.” — Kate
Everson
English-speaking
Western executives often have an advantage because English is the dominant
global language for business. But this also can become a weakness. Executives
may assume that a common language means a common culture and common context,
but it’s actually the most common obstacle to engagement.
Western
executives have extra responsibility in global engagement because they come
with a different lens than some other countries. English-speaking countries
that once imperially ruled today’s emerging nations have more responsibility to
understand and acknowledge this historical and social context. Understanding
the privilege of having English as a first language in a multinational world is
one of the bigger adjustments for multinational executives.
Western
businesses can no longer expect the world to come to them. Since the financial
crisis of 2008, when legacy markets in the world’s wealthiest nations reeled,
the world saw growth not only in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South India,
but also in many emerging nations. LindaRottenberg, co-founder and CEO of
nonprofit company Endeavor, which advances high-impact entrepreneurship around
the world, coined the term “E2E” for “emerging market to emerging market” in
2011.
“When
I came up with that, my point was that so many Americans that I spoke to —
especially in Silicon Valley — assumed they were like Florence in the age of
the Renaissance,” she said. “There was a sense that anyone who wanted to grow
big had to come to the United States, the hotbed of action.
“What
I started seeing were companies in Brazil going to Turkey and the Middle East,
and companies in Asia finding Latin America and realizing they could almost
bypass the so-called developed world because they had enough markets and growth
opportunities among themselves.”
Organizations
may survive without being global, but without adjustment, nonglobal Western
organizations will miss out on their own potential growth.
Engagement
Is the Global Edge
Global executives have to engage. They must be able to deal with local personnel and their cultural contexts.
Global executives have to engage. They must be able to deal with local personnel and their cultural contexts.
Diane
Johnson, director of talent at Kennametal Inc., a global tooling, mining and
highway construction company with customers in more than 60 nations, said
trust is primary to successful global engagement.
“Most
cultural appreciation requires the time to build a relationship and to build
trust,” she said. “That’s really the engagement part. That’s the investment on
the front end that is necessary for the engagementconnection.”
Executives
must connect to the people under their direction, even if they need to travel
to communicate face to face with their direct reports.
“The
glue that helps engagement happen is the trusting relationship that holds
things together when things seem to be falling apart,” Johnson said. “You are
more willing to walk through fire for the person you trust.”
However,
traditional expatriate training doesn’t go far enough for most Western
executives to be effective abroad. Competencies needed for global engagement
focus heavily on interpersonal skills; global executives need more.
A
Willingness to Learn
In their 2002 foundational study of global leadership titled “Developing Global Executives,” Morgan McCall Jr. and George Hollenbeck established a list of learnable behaviors:
In their 2002 foundational study of global leadership titled “Developing Global Executives,” Morgan McCall Jr. and George Hollenbeck established a list of learnable behaviors:
- Open-minded and flexible in thought and tactics
- Cultural
interest and sensitivity
- Able
to deal with complexity
- Resilient,
resourceful, optimistic and energetic
- Honesty
and integrity
- Stable
personal life
- Value-added technical or business skills
In
2014, writing for Forbes.com, Jack Zenger, CEO of the leadership development
firm Zenger Folkman, offered six skills for global leaders: strategic
perspective, customer focus and understanding, ability to spot trends, engaged
and committed teams, willingness to take risks, and deep knowledge and
expertise.
The commonality
between these skills and behaviors is emotional intelligence, and they all can
be developed through assessment, learning and coaching. But they are too often
mistakenly taken for granted.
In
her book, “Crazy Is a Compliment,” Endeavor’s Rottenberg also stresses
authenticity as a key tenet. “People can see right through inauthenticity.
People who try to change themselves based on what they think different cultures
want are doomed to fail. You can be culturally sensitive and still be true to
who you are.”
For
meaningful engagement to occur, executives must not only be authentic but also
they must beadept when adjusting to local culture while still employing
leadership skills. Learning to admit one is still learning is surprisingly
difficult for many executives, but it’s vital to being stylistically engaging,
especially with local personnel.
With
this in mind, willingness to learn about local religion, educational systems
and governmental systems will pay huge dividends in working effectively with
local co-workers and subordinates. Individuals should consistently place
themselves in unfamiliar situations toexpose weaknesses that need to be
developed. Or consider identifying a local coach to help navigate company and
government relationships in a new region.
“A
successful global leader has learning agility beyond the job,” Johnson said.
“If they listen well, they do better. Listening implies you don’t know
everything, and you are trying to listen to see what the specific needs of a
particular region are.”
What
Companies Are Missing
Companies need to help people practice learning agility and gain tacit knowledge, so they can understand and improve their ability to respond to situations that are new to them.
Companies need to help people practice learning agility and gain tacit knowledge, so they can understand and improve their ability to respond to situations that are new to them.
While
executives are expected to be experts, theysimultaneously must learn about
local cultures. The first step is for them to understand their own
learningstyle.
There
are many ways to do this, but one approach, described by Maxine Dalton, author
of “Learning Tactics Inventory,” is for a leader to ask if he learns best by:
going to a book and seeking information, seeking advice from people to
understand their approaches, or by jumping in and experimenting.
The
best mode is to use all three. Working globally, executives should always be
learning different things. But in too many cases, the “leader as learner” role
doesn’tappear soon enough. Executives need to become broad learners earlier so
they practice learning skillsregularly.
The
unfortunate reality is that, after an overseasassignment, little learning takes
place. Executives come back to the home office and report that no one asks them
about their experiences. Regular debriefs could uncover insight and lessons
learned that greatly enhance the global effectiveness of the entireenterprise.
The
goal is to gain the ability to approach things differently. In their book “What
Is Global Leadership,” Ernest Gundling, Terry Hogan and Karen Cvitkovich advise
leaders to seek out critical differences and “invite theunexpected.”
Being
global is a competitive advantage for individuals and organizations as so much
international business relies on engagement with emerging economies. Corporate
learning must evolve to become globally oriented. In doing so, Western
businesses and leaders will benefit from honing these teachable learning skills
at a time when few companies have focused on it.
Recall
the petrochemical company’s “introduce yourself to the most different person”
icebreaker. The exercise would likely play out quite differently with a group
of seasoned global leaders. Instead of avoiding or denying differences, the
group would be eager to identify and learn from those who could help them the
most: those most unlike themselves.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario