Business Insider
You can't expect negotiations with the French to be like negotiations with
Americans, and the same holds true for every culture around the world.
British
linguist Richard D. Lewis charted communication patterns as well as leadership
styles and cultural identities in his book, "When Cultures Collide,"
which is now in a third edition. His organization offers classes in
cross-cultural communication for clients like Unilever and BMW.
Although
cultural generalizations can be overly reductive, Lewis, who speaks 10
languages, insists it can be done fairly. "Determining national
characteristics is treading a minefield of inaccurate assessment and surprising
exception. There is, however, such a thing as a national norm," he writes.
Scroll
down to see Lewis' insights on negotiating with people around the world.
AMERICANS
lay their cards on the table and resolve disagreements
quickly with one or both sides making concessions.
CANADIANS are inclined to seek harmony but are similar to Americans in their
directness.
PEOPLE
IN THE UK tend to avoid confrontation in an understated,
mannered, and humorous style that can be either powerful or inefficient.
GERMANS rely on logic but "tend to amass more evidence and labor their
points more than either the British or the French."
When meeting with THE
FRENCH, be prepared for a vigorous, logical debate.
ITALIANS "regard their languages as instruments of eloquence" and take
a verbose, flexible approach to negotiations.
Like Italians,
SPANISH will "pull out every stop if need be to achieve greater
expressiveness."
Among the Nordic countries, SWEDES often have the most wide-ranging discussions.
FINNS tend to value concision.
Most NORWEGIANS
fall somewhere in between Swedes and Finns.
THE
SWISS tend to be straightforward, nonaggressive negotiators.
They obtain concessions by expressing confidence in the quality and value of
their goods and services.
HUNGARIANS value eloquence over logic and are unafraid to talk over each other.
BULGARIANS may take a circuitous approach to negotiations before seeking a
mutually beneficial resolution, which will often get screwed up by bureaucracy.
POLES
often have a communication style that is
"enigmatic, ranging from a matter-of-fact pragmatic style to a wordy,
sentimental, romantic approach to any given subject."
THE
DUTCH are focused on facts and figures but "are also
great talkers and rarely make final decisions without a long 'Dutch' debate,
sometimes approaching the danger zone of over-analysis."
THE
CHINESE tend to be more direct than the Japanese and some
other East Asians. However, meetings are principally for information gathering,
with the real decisions made elsewhere.
People IN HONG
KONG negotiate much more briskly to achieve quick results.
THE
INDIAN English "excel in ambiguity, and such things as
truth and appearances are often subject to negotiation."
AUSTRALIANS tend to have a loose and frank conversational style.
SINGAPOREANS generally take time to build a relationship, after which they can be
shrewd negotiators.
KOREANS tend to be energetic conversationalists who seek to close deals
quickly, occasionally stretching the truth.
INDONESIANS tend to be very deferential conversationalists, sometimes to the point
of ambiguity.
ISRAELIS tend to proceed logically on most issues but emotionally on some.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario